To Dispute or Refute

   Children dispute the world that surrounds them with a simple spontaneous “uh-uh” long before they have given the topic or subject at hand a moment of thought. This is human natures way of denial, expressed by the ignorance of the individual, a way of refusal to accept the truth of fact that forces itself onto a closed and/or empty mind.

    At some point in the development of the child’s intellectual growth this self denial is overwhelmed by the truth as they accumulate knowledge which refutes the limited intellectual scope of their youth. When they learn that they can dispute, dispute, dispute and it has no benefit toward understanding until they have an enough knowledge that refutes their own unthinking disputes, and then they may understand.

  The so called liberal mind in America is nothing more than people that in spite of the accumulation of knowledge never developed the intellectual skill of refuting their own “uh-uh’s” from childhood. They take the knowledge they acquire and say “uh-uh” and dispute the very knowledge that has the information to refute, and still dispute with their childish UH-UH followed with gibberish from their childhood.

   It is the world of make believe and fantasy held in place by refusing to acknowledge their own physical maturity and the only skill given by human nature to children “denial” they can dispute but they cannot refute.

   We as humans cannot justify the unjustifiable no matter the degree of denial employed. No one has a good enough memory to be a perfect liar and you should know you are ignorant when you believe you’re smarter or more intelligent than those who came before you for it is they that enabled you.

GAP

Individuality & leadership

  The civil discourse we witness between men/women is the refection of our individuality but to then add the influence of collectives to that discourse raises the potential level to extreme violence between them. Every individual within a collective has surrendered his/her individuality to the group, thus they are no longer individuals but members of the herd or a band of brothers. The only place this form of collective effort by people becomes a positive affect to a society is in the military for the security purposes’ of the whole society.

  No two given people agree on everything, so in order to maintain our individuality certain limits must be imposed by the whole of a civilization and they must always be mutually agreed on or self imposed. Standards are obvious to all, beyond that everything else, is off the table and individually decided. That represents Americas’ Constitution and every new civil law created moves America closer and closer to a collective and further and further from individuality which is always the opposite of the primary goal and purposes of our Constitution.

   I have never met an American that didn’t view themselves as an individualist and I have come to understand that many of them are delusional or don’t understand what it means. You can’t say you’re an active member of a union and claim the mantel of an individualist at the same time. You can’t say you’re an active member of any collective group and claim the mantel of an individualist unless you loudly protest and appose them when you don’t agree with them.

  What Americans are witnessing in the tea party movement is pure individualism that is why they have no head person to represent them nor do they want one. The organizers of tea parties do not claim leadership and if and when they ever do, they will cease being representative of individuals but of a collective. Every individual that attends tea parties agrees on certain things but disagree on many others and it is those certain things only that they agree on, that brings them together, and no leader will ever decide what those agreements or disagreements’ are. That is what makes them true American patriots.

   Having said all that, it should be noted that the congress and the entire federal government are not the peoples leaders the people of the United States have no leaders of our society we accept leaders only in war.

GAP