Another Mans Shoes

     Present a problem to ten different people that do not know each other and ask them too independently without consultation put forth a solution. In all likelihood you get back ten different ways to solve the problem. Now present those solutions to ten different people independently that meet the same criteria and ask them to select the best solution by numbering 1-10 w/# 1 being the best. In all likelihood you will not get a consensus for any of the ten solutions. The point being; that people don’t think the same in specific terms nor will they agree in the same specific manner absent influencing each other. So it is with human nature.

   The past (history) is or should be an accurate accounting of events minus the opinions of causal effects unless we just want to repeat them also. We have to make the same choices of history under the same conditions that were present back then; we can never have any certainty that our choices will make any difference as too the result of our actions.

   In today’s world and societies when children commit unacceptable acts we lessen their blame or responsibility based on their youthful ignorance and capacity to understand the gravity of their actions. The historical choices of man should also be in like fashion, to consider man’s maturity on the specifics of history. Even in today’s so called modern world, man is still grappling with and repeating many of the same misplaced choices and judgments of history that we never understood all along the way from then till now.

   Much of it has to do with the perspective of the powers that be at any given time. The powers that be could have been the individual? Ethnicity?, king?, president?, union? Etc; for example; from the prospective of a king, slavery is a good thing if done right and excludes specific ethnicities or classes whereas from an individual perspective it’s only good if their specific ethnicity or class is excluded from slavery and so on. History has never played favorites at one time or another on slavery it all boiled down to the choices of the powers that be yesterday, today or tomorrow.

   GAP

Freedom; what it is, and what it is not.

                              Freedom; what it is, and what it is not.

   Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others.

   In this light the government at all levels has lost sight by the introduction of laws that changes us from the freest nation on earth into a nation of serfs. This raises the question about the purpose or value of laws beyond those set forth in our founding.

   A law does not make a person behave in any specific way; it only represents a threat of reprisal and cannot stop a free person from taking the liberty to violate it. The sum of more laws only means more punishments and imprisonment to be carried-out by the government on the free people of our nation. Our laws should be more like; “don’t sweat the small violations and all violations are small”. Did or have you ever considered why the founders didn’t create a civil or federal police force and left policing if necessary to we the people. That as we as a nation grew we didn’t create law enforcement agencies we created police agencies for the purpose of keeping the peace, not enforcing the laws but to protect us from violence and crime and investigation, where law enforcement was strictly the purview of the legal system and the courts.

   Today our government has changed policing into surveillance of everything we do, and call it law enforcement that’s what is called a “police state” which no longer allows the liberty of being free people.

   I view myself as a free person and if someone or group approaches me in an aggressive manner and worse yet is armed I will perceive it as a threat and will aggressively defend myself, and a uniform or badge is not a permission slip for such behavior. GAP

P.S. America is a nation that desperately needs to be reset and rebooted.

The civil position and pledge of Americans

   The civil position and pledge of Americans in times gone by that will make a comeback as our nation wavers under socialist world pressure.    

  I swear no allegiance to any man and an adversary to all bullies and otherwise freeloaders, defender of the meek and downtrodden w/o exception. When the smoke clears I will be standing tall and/or among the ghosts of my ancestors. I disavow association w/all those whom do not maintain fidelity or stand in defiance of the Constitution of the United States of America. GAP

"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."-- Thomas Jefferson (Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 17, 1782)

"Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants." --Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1, 1787

"It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they would be the sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please. Certainly no such universal power was meant to be given them. It [the Constitution] was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect." --Thomas Jefferson, Opinion on a National Bank, 1791

"In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Regard not the particular sect or denomination of the candidate -- look to his character." --Noah Webster

"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions." --James Madison, letter to Edmund Pendleton, 1792

"On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 1823

"During the course of administration, and in order to disturb it, the artillery of the press has been levelled against us, charged with whatsoever its licentiousness could devise or dare. These abuses of an institution so important to freedom and science are deeply to be regretted, inasmuch as they tend to lessen its usefulness and to sap its safety." --Thomas Jefferson, Second Inaugural Address, 1805

Atta-boy Vs Awe-shit

  

   Every man/women as an individual gives by action or word to the society they live in “enlightenment”, whither we notice or not, even if it is, but a one time occurrence. It’s sort of like the Atta-boy/girl or awe-shit contributions to a job or to society at large. In self-evident truth, each individual gives far more awe-shits than Atta-boy/girls’.

But this does not lessen the value to a job or a society just because Atta-boy/girls may be rare, it means we need to be on the alert not to let them slip by unnoticed regardless the individual source. Unlike the joke, one or many awe-shits do not wipe out or lessen from the value of the Atta-boy/girls.

   I could list a lot of awe-shits that came from Albert Einstein as an individual, but no one can claim they even in aggregate deter from his Atta-boy contributions to the knowledge and thus additional enlightenment of mankind.

   Regardless of the personal awe-shits of the founding fathers of The United States of America they produced more Atta-boys by far than awe-shits yet our modern educational system focuses on their personal awe-shits and by inference tries to degrade the value of their Atta-boy contributions to America and the entire world of man. All that should tell us is, that American academia can no longer tell the difference between an Atta-boy and an awe-shit. This also stands true for American history in general.

   Overall that comes to one big awe-shit for American academia.    

Half Measures

   Half measures won’t do anymore in America; that is if the American people have truly woken from their slumber of a hundred plus years. We the people must not only put a stop to the corruption of collectivism but must undo all the damage to the systems of our government and society without backsliding in our efforts.

   It will be like a child of wealth being disinherited, the shock of suddenly having to be individually, personally responsible and is never psychologically or physically pain free. It will require a strength of character that hasn’t been seen in the world since our founders stood up against all the powers of the world and the internal status quo of people locked in time simultaneously, but is the bitter pill each American has to take to heal the whole of our sickness.

   All forms of collectivism must be limited in both social and political power in size and scope which includes; business, labor, political parties and religion creating a better balance between the individual and collective powers that develop within. This includes all levels of government, federal, state, cities and towns. The growths of all political and civil powers have to be kept proportional with the individual’s ability to cope with.

   Only intelligent people absent personal ambition will be able to create a working formula fitted into and compatible with the Constitution, will have the capacity to rectify the imbalances that have rendered the individual impotent in American society.

    America was created for the individual, not the group, and a return to that individuality of persons will be the salvation that reunites a Nation that once held out hope to all Nations of the world.

GAP

About The Past

   The past of the great of the Mayan empire the great Egyptian culture The great Persian empire The great Roman empire the lost Continent etc. when it comes to the primary ethnicities highlighted in today's modern cultures just how far back in history can any of them lay claim or deny previous advances or declines of their own ethnicity in evolutionary terms when in all reality the further back you look at the details of the past they become less and less relevant to anyone living today and even the major events of history have no more relevance than the lessons we today can draw from them and certainly no connection to ethnicity. Every culture of humans in all history has had and will have its bigots, racists, bullies and ignorant among them which leads men astray from advancement and/or progress into the future, it is the why of human nature. It has only been the original founding documents of America that has made a serious attempt at correcting the cultural and social errors of earlier humanity.

   While it is human theology that has contributed most to past human behavior by teaching men about what they think god or Allah or what ever deity, wants us to do or what it would do or has done regarding whatever transgressions’ that man has committed. For example; the Jews and Christians teach that god has punished mankind’s posterity for the sins of Adam and Eve. If this was true, it is then logical for man, that he is doing gods work by punishing the ethnicity of others for perceived sins against man and/or God, contradictions not withstanding.     

    It’s like a reputation, you have to live up to it or live it down but you can’t have it both ways, history is fixed and only the ignorant in time will not see it by it’s deceitful presentations by the present. The known truths in human history can set man free from the errors of the past in today’s world, but the deceit and self deceit in our beliefs have to be the first to go.

    This writer knows at this time in history the universal application of known truths is not feasible, so I suggest we start where Americas’ forefathers left off and create the most enlighten nation on this earth as god or Allah most certainly intended. (Skip the middle men and flimflam artists)

    It has to start with accepting history as it was, not how we wished it had been, by all American citizens including your own personal history.

GAP   

Co-opted

   The primary impediment to Americans today is the co-opting of our language, by this I mean we the people believe the meanings of our words so much so that when a liberal or communist group call themselves by words that we understand the meaning of we accept them as one of us, when in truth they are just the opposite of what we believe them to be. Like; “Students for a Democratic Society” (SDS) where the last thing they desire or seek is a more democratic way while what they seek is a collective society at best or anarchy at worst.

   Many of the words they use to describe their organizations like; freedom, liberty, justice, human rights, fairness, truth, children etc. are all to mislead and raise money for collectivist theories’ and undermine the very system of government via our Constitution most of us love and understand and wish only to carry forward.

   So basically in this modern world the American people need to learn how to keep from being duped by names or misapplied use of words by being skeptical and never, never judge a book by its cover.

   The Communists and the Muslim’s are/have become expert at using our own language and systems against the people to make further inroads that at some point we may not be able to recover from unless the people at large can recognize they are being duped.

   Our current president, Obama speaks like he really believes the words he uses at the same time his every action contradicts every speech he gives. He raises our concerns about things like excessive spending and deficits in his speeches while simultaneously rising spending and deficits with gusto without blinking an eye. He uses words as the smoke and mirrors of his intent and those of us that still believe his words are fools or cohorts.

   Do precisely what he himself told us to do, Judge him by those he has surrounded him self with!!!     

Crooks, Communists, Muslims, elite disgruntled un-American pro-socialist egotistical A-holes!!

GAP

Don't Tread On Us

   There are a few simple and basic things all American children must learn and understand before the older generation or even their peers for the most part, will accept them as mature adults with an intelligent capacity.

   These type responses’ are at first defensive, but always harbor an offensive response. That is what Americans are all about because we individually view none, as our superior or ruler and in that sense even from uppity children we will always become belligerent when we think we are being put upon. (Notice I didn’t say feel we are put upon)

   The greatest weakness we Americans have is a slowness to catch on to the manipulators and the ignorant in society and the world, but once we catch on, we will never back-down or submit to them.

   This child-like behavior when used by government officials will garner nothing short of offensive action from the adult citizens among the populace. American government was created to only do for the people, not to them, and pick and choose, what segment or segments of society will garner government support, is not within its province.

   We will discriminate, so they may as well start building the gulags’ to hold us in, and I’ll bet there will be many black Americans right along with all the rest, once they catch-on that it’s not about skin color but individual sovereignty, then they will no longer give Obama a pass because of his skin color.

   Every black American whose slave ancestors chose to remain after emancipation, are full fledged Americans as any others, and I cannot bring myself to think, that just after they achieved that recognition across the board, they will re- subjugate themselves under the banners and cry of socialist fairness. (Misery does not enjoy company!!)   

  “Tolerance” of individuals or groups to abuse, particularly by government is not an American value and never has been, and if you don’t believe me, ask any man or women descended from slavery, it is a socialist tool of submission. True Americans are compassionate both in the benevolent and offensive behavior of our character.

The best defense is a strong offence!! And offence used in defense is no vice.

   (G.A.P.)     

Disperse you Rebels

   Mankind by his very nature is a lobo animal, but is always seeking a perceived advantage in his/her life and living conditions. Once he came to the realization that in hunting gathering, mating and security there were advantages too be had, so he started civilizations or tribes as it were above and beyond the blood line of immediate families. But for civilization to grow and prosper required a strong individual or group to keep it even a little bit secure for its entire membership. This means each citizen had to surrender some parts of their individual sovereignty to the ruling entity or monarch.  

   For many centuries this system for growth was a hardship akin to slavery and in fact sometimes was outright slavery and during those times the ruling class found the power of human control addicting, and abused the authority vested in them to the extreme suffrages of the masses. To keep an edge the ruling class engaged the masses in war after war to expand their power and keep any challenges to their authority at bay with brute force.

   Flash forward to the human migration to America were only many small tribes occupied the land and a variety of exploring armies from around the globe sought to make claims to the land.

   The first who came to actually settle here and make a new home in America held no loyalty or respect for the tyrants or nations they fled and all they wanted was to be sovereign individuals again free men/women, like it was in mankind’s beginnings.

   By 1840 69% of America’s population were farmer’s, still sovereign people as per the end of the revolution against Great Britain and in accordance with our Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  By 1900 only 38% were farmers due to the industrial revolution. By 1950 12% and by 1990 2.6%  

   By farmers today, we are really talking about people that live in a dispersed rural setting, where many live in the suburbs but travel to the cities and towns for their employment. Which condition opens the door to the power manipulators in the metropolitan areas becoming despotic and the making of laws and ordinances that go against all the very principals of our founding that spurred us to greatness as a nation in the first place. This dependence on elite government officials takes men/women of the masses back in time by a thousand years of individual development and in our civil intercourse. In plain language a return to the slave mentality that kept mankind from moving forward until America burst onto the scene from our history showing sovereignty of mind is equally as important to mankind as physical sovereignty and that mankind needs both to reach his/her fullest potential.

   If we; that are humanity in general, wish to continue the forward growth to which America has shown in the past is our destiny, we need a new technological revolution akin to the industrial one of the past. We can call it whatever we chose, the communications revolution or digital revolution or what ever, but it holds the modern equivalent of a new improved revolution for human progress. To avoid a retrograde condition for men/women as individuals it would logically require a dilution of authority over them, this authority cannot be diluted in the current compact hovels of large towns and cities and the human nature of man within them, without thinning the herd so to speak..

   For example; if a large city made an ordinance or law that forbid residency to all those whose physical presence is not critical to their employment more than half would have to take up residence outside its geographically established boundaries. The savings to the city in transportation, energy use, police etc. alone would be monumental thus requiring a much reduce need of that cities resources, leading to a reduction in the governance of it. The follow on conditions would then stand to reason that businesses, that cannot not show the necessity of being located within the boundaries likewise forced to relocate to a less densely crowded place. With the advantages of modern technology dispersing the hovels of large cities and towns of people would in every instance be cost effect and free people from the élite power grabbers, giving them back their individual sovereignty while at the same time forcing the thousands of civil freeloaders to become personally responsible.

   Collectivism of all its varying degrees at one time or another had its advantages and man needs to recognize when it becomes counter productive to his/her individual growth. America could very well be the innovator for its own progress and lead the world anew, by example. I’ll leave the specific details on how to reverse the effects of the industrial revolution that has compacted people in such unnatural conditions to better minds than mine but remember you heard it from me first.

   How do you keep them in the hovels of cities once they’ve seen freedom and sovereignty?

GAP

Critical Thinking

   The skill of “critical thinking” what is it and how does one acquire it or is it just something that really smart people can develop? Ever since I first heard the Phrase coined “critical Thinking” and that modern day students are not being taught this important skill, made me wonder what it is and how do they know what critical thinking is, being as most of them were taught the same way the students are taught today. Possible it’s, they that have this deficit and it’s their ego expressing feelings of superiority.

   So I decided to do some critical thinking on the subject of “critical thinking”. How many different kinds of thinking are there; shallow thinking, reactive thinking, concentrative thinking, imaginative thinking, subjective thinking, objective thinking and the grand master non thinking. I’m sure I missed a few like introverted or extraverted but maybe I’m being too critical in my thinking. But adding it all up tends to make me think we didn’t need to add to such a list by adding the phrase “critical thinking” to it, couldn’t we just get along with one of the older descriptives of thinking.

   Then I decided that what is needed instead of addition to a long list of how we think, maybe what we need to do is synthesize the list for simplicity. This ultimately led me to think that there are only two kinds of thinking, subjective and objective of which I think they are trying to coin a substitute for objective thinking in a more modern vernacular because they don’t think that all of us that lack the skill of critical thinking know what objective thinking is, “it’s critical thinking you egotistical maniacs”!

   Now that I did all that critical thinking on critical thinking brings us to the point they are trying to make, and they are right we no longer teach students the skill of objective thought and its because academia no longer trains teachers in objective thinking they only teach them in the art of propaganda to produce monolithic zombies for the great world wide social collective that dances in their heads.

   The bottom line in my rant is this; only slaves and chattel of the human mind fall or sucker for their propaganda, the rest of society developed “critical thinking” on our own dime thank you, in spite of academia.

GAP                                  

Just so Much Noise

   To what practical purpose or value does sound have if no living thing can hear it or understand it? The same holds true for light, or any other of the sensors of the body, if you cannot sense them or understand them they would be valueless tools with no purpose or value to human life. Isn’t it great that we humans have no choice but to experience the benefits of the senses of our own bodies?

   A loud sound to an infant gets its attention but sadly it has no attention to apply. If it’s just a loud sound but has no follow up to the child it will learn to ignore it but it will, always be heard. Eventually the child will investigate the source of the sound but when it finds the source will it understand, most likely not? It will most likely chalk it up to Normal background noise in life and learn to ignore it.

    The preceding is what has developed between people in general because we make noise just for the sake of making noise, so most ignore it and no understanding is ever arrived at. Normal conversations between people appears to be each person making noise and neither understands the source of the others noise. For all practical purposes we talk past one another and only hear the noise with no understanding.

   The more literate American society becomes the more and wider the disparities of understanding between us becomes, and do to the ego no one wants to say I don’t understand what you’re saying! What we do, do is assume we understand instead of demanding clarity and our conversations end up like sound bites on TV totally lacking mutual understanding. We tend to assume what the other persons thoughts are when we don’t clarify.

   As a third party listening, I am fed up hearing one say to the other “so what you’re saying is” followed by gross misinterpretation of the others words. A false premise in conversations is the leading culprits and in failing to clarify those false premises leads to pure nonsense.  Any conversation that ends with, “we just have to agree to disagree” is a complete cop out and nothing short of having just made noise for its own sake, not an intelligent conversation.

   The truth in any matter under discussion is undeniable if the conversation is completely synthesized, and failing to discover that truth leaves both sides of the conversation with but one reality, “neither one knows what they are talking about”. (Just noise)

   We all make poor or bad decisions in life but after 71 years of life I can tell you that everyone, that is every bad decision or judgment I made, was always from using my emotions over my better objective thought processes without exception. I can also tell you that through objective observation of my fellow man it appears to me, to be a universal flaw in the character and thought processes of mankind in general.

   It primarily occurs for what can only be described as ignorance meaning that when we don’t have the knowledge and/or understanding to make a sound objective decision we humans fall back on how we feel about it. That does not include all those that emotionally think they know and understand everything, it is their home base of thought or thinking at all times, and becomes totally out of objective control completely, through the ego of celebrity. 

GAP      

Synthesis

   The mind of man is not in its entirety photogenic, particularly when it comes to the spoken or written word. Although some phrases may be recalled specifically, the general context goes through a process of synthesizing that arrives as a conceptual picture of it for memory, the details are still there but must go through a focused internal study to find them. (That is why we have reference books etc!)

   Modern educated people today use many words from their learned vocabularies that are not chosen appropriately for the context in which they are used, sometimes intentionally, most times out of their own ignorance were they just seem to fit. This all leads to the listener or reader being unable to synthesize the context giving them an incomplete conceptual picture like a redacted, incomplete or edited picture. So what they might see from memory; the landscape may be yellow, the grass blue, the sun black, the clouds green, and the trees pink, which is nothing like the context of what the speaker or writer was trying to impart. Other times it may be or have a more subtle impact on the context but more than likely a key part of it like using may or can or may and shall inappropriately. Sometime and most prolific misuse is saying you believe something when in fact you don’t know or understand it. All of the fore mentioned degrades the understanding in our civil intercourse in fact bastardizes it.

    This impairment of our communicative skills leads us to make assumptions like; putting someone in authority over others just because they may be skilled at a job, but not shown to be skilled in leadership.

   Those today considered as intellectuals are more likely to be street wise manipulators as apposed to being intellectual in a general or well rounded educational sense.

   Our educators today tend to teach manipulation of the general population by appealing to the emotional as apposed to intellectual enlightenment. Intellectual skills are part of what moves societies forward but rarely leads it constructively. Most truly intellectual people today are like the Germans after WWII, they deny association to the word “intellectual” like the Germans denied association to the word “Nazi”. Modern day, so called intellectuals are for the most part are self promoters as apposed to social or political innovators. They demean the very word “intellectual”.

   Pollution is the hallmark of human civilizations. The most hazardous of pollution to humans is that of the pollution of the human mind some more so than others, but in modern times all. Most pollution of the human mind is caused by societies or cultures and is intentionally polluted to satisfy the ambitions of avarice.

   This problem as far as the individual is concerned needs filtering today as much or more so than has ever been because modern communications between us has accelerated polluting at a rate that is unsustainable to the human condition. The only effective filter known is truth of fact applied to each and every pollutant thereby reducing the aggregate of the effects on humanity at large.

   The truth of fact cannot be imposed on the individual it has to be self acquired and can only be so acquired by recognition of the pollution each holds within and then filtered with the truth. Once filtered is called enlightenment.

   There is only one truth for each pollutant, the idea of multiple truths is just one such pollutant that has infected the minds of men. The truth of fact is established when no objective argument can refute it thus making it undeniable. The only thing that causes a change as to the truth is acquired human knowledge over time. As an individual if you don’t have the knowledge to objectively refute the otherwise known truth, you cannot then declare your own truth separate and apart from the otherwise known truth.

   The truth does not exist in the subjective and can only be found by the objective applications of the human mind. The recognition of the reality of mankind's history does not establish the truth’s of today, but of yesterday!

 GAP  

Obama & Islam

   The world known truth of fact, when it comes right to it regarding individual human rights, English law and American law set the world standards, which all other nations and cultures only give lip service to internationally.

    The proposition put forth to NASA by the Obama administration that it was due to Muslim countries that advanced the world in mathematics justifies sharing state secrets with them now is only fair, is by all history a farcical understanding of history garnered from his Muslim up bringing.

    At the time in history when Arabic countries were advancing in mathematics they were not Muslim but when Mohammad imposed his Islamic theory on them he damned their efforts toward progress as a people by use of the sword against any and all intelligent people in order to keep them in his century forever as slaves to his will. Mohammad for all intense and purpose was an opportunistic barbarian that would not tolerate decent from his personal dogma and backed it up with brutality and death to any and all dissenters.

   The Arab peoples have as much potential intellectually as any others but can only use it in destructive ways as per the instructions left them via the Koran, on punishment of death even to this day. The true believers of Islam are ignorant barbarians they offer others of this world only to join them in their ignorance or death. Obama is only following Islamic dictate and is only using his western education to further the cause Mohammad initiated, which is capitulation or death.

   Only the most ignorant of humanity could conceive that the purpose for human life was to be satisfied with perpetual sex in the here after. I can assure you that if Allah made anything better than sex he/she kept it for himself in the here after. And to top it off virgins are the worst lay any man will ever get unless he is also sexually ignorant.

   It is this writers conviction that Obama desires to be the modern equivalent of Mohammad over the United States where it is only his personal will and dictates that all Americans must submit to, but American history tells us how that will end.

GAP    

Why We Shall Prevail

   As long as Americans have the right to keep and bear arms there can never be a complete government take over of our lives because when push come to shove in a show of force all we have to do is step out of back doors take one shot each, and the takeover will be decimated.

   Fifty percent of those who elected BHO made an idealistic mistake and they are in regret as I write. The rest are hard core but only represent 30-35 percent of the whole, which is a world wide percentage in every country on earth even under the strictest controls governments can put in place. The only difference between Americans and other peoples is the ownership of personal weapons which enables us to push back against overwhelming government power and we will always push back when push comes to shove. We are born of the gun and can only die by it.

    Those who imagine they are oppressed in America have no idea what real oppression is like. When the imagined oppressed become threatening and violent against there imagined oppressors, they will experience suppression of their efforts but will still not be oppressed under our Constitution.

    In every culture on earth there are individuals and groups that seek to oppress others, but in America any of their successes will soon be put asunder under the cleansing light of our Constitution by, “we the people”.    

   "The bosom of America is open to receive not only the Opulent and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all Nations and Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation of all our rights and privileges, if by decency and propriety of conduct they appear to merit the enjoyment." --George Washington emphasis added. By GAP

     Make note; Washington used the phrase “of all our rights and privileges” making clear that our rights and privileges exist only within our jurisdiction not recognized universally of or in the whole world of peoples, thus making ones propriety and conduct a limiting factor to the rights of citizenship. This is why illegal immigration should exclude the right to become a citizen of the United States of America.

"The dons, the bashaws, the grandees, the patricians, the sachems, the nabobs, call them by what names you please, sigh and groan and fret, and sometimes stamp and foam and curse, but all in vain. The decree is gone forth, and it cannot be recalled, that a more equal liberty than has prevailed in other parts of the earth must be established in America." --John Adams, letter to Patrick Henry, 1776

"[W]e ought to deprecate the hazard attending ardent and susceptible minds, from being too strongly and too early prepossessed in favor of other political systems, before they are capable of appreciating their own." --George Washington, letter to the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 1795

GAP

Parties & Caucus's Vs Representation

"They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they would be the sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please.... Certainly no such universal power was meant to be given them. It was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect." --Thomas Jefferson, 1791

   Elected officials today and how they represent their constituent’s compounds what Jefferson decried by not considering all equally by; Balkanizing the Congress, the Judiciary and the Bureaucracy through the Administrative Branch by specialized groupings of citizens and specialized considerations for each. No such view of American citizens was ever contemplated by the Constitution but is the hallmark of progressive minds in government.

   No Caucus formed in Congress on specialized issues that exclude any other members from participating because of party, gender, race or sexual preference etc is Constitutional. The Constitution gives congress the right to establish there own rules but only if those rules fall within the spirit and intent of equal representation of there constituents, which the present caucus system fails miserably to do, and is the example they have set for society at large that has created most of the civil strife we all live with today.  

   This illegal activity in congress must stop and their rules regarding Caucus’s changed if they are to ever be able to represent all their constituents on a equal footing. While were at it, party control of branches of government is also unconstitutional.

   Party control and influence in government is the source and cause of government corruption through-out, that is why our representatives no longer care what individual constituents think about anything only what the given party leaders say or instructs them that counts anymore, they have all become rubber stamps for the civilian unelected party elites as a forth and I might say Unconstitutional branch of government.

   Politics is the art of deceit once elected we the people expect politics to stop at door of all government offices.

Political Science (sic) is just that, the teaching of our youth in the art of deceit.

   Under these conditions in American government all they have accomplished is to make all true Patriots enemies’ of the State    

GAP 

Unified Theory

           Unified Theory of the Human Thought Process

  When a human being is born we empirically know it has a physical brain developed sufficiently and specifically as a biological engine that controls the entire body determined primarily by the blueprints in the genetic codes inherent in it, but the personality and character is developed after birth.

   Then comes, the mind to which we have only circumstantial evidence of its existence but we know from experience that all imaginative and reasoning of thought is inherent within it.

   All things in our human existence that have little to no empirical evidence of form or design are considered metaphysical, if and until we develop physical, empirical evidence. Based on circumstantial evidence alone we (mankind) develop philosophical theories regarding these circumstantial phenomenons such as God, love, origin of a species, universal systems and laws etc.

   This theory is based on both observed and personally experienced circumstantial evidence regarding the system of universal human thought. (How we all think) (The art of critical thinking, or not!)

   All human thought is developed and takes place in the mind of man and is a separate entity from the physical brain. The brain contains in the frontal lobes a buffering transceiver as its link to the metaphysical mind of man, a window as it were for the mind into the physical world of our existence. The metaphysical mind has the ability to deliberately override the functions of the brain/body and contains all learned knowledge in both subjective and objective categories’ contained in mind-sets in like kind.

   The subjective mind-sets are developed, controlled and set by the imagination thru the perceptions’ of the body. (Fantasy) (Imaginative suppositions)Whereas the objective mind-sets are developed independently from, “reasoned learned knowledge”, or by application of reasoning applied to the imaginative mind-sets and are reset after vetting with full understanding in the objective category of mind-sets. The objective mind will not accept incomplete reasoned and vetted knowledge, which is reserved to the subjective and imaginative mind-set category. All the fore mentioned determine this; the brain/body is what you are, while the mind is who you are! The personality and/or character of us all are developed within the mind.

   Because the metaphysical mind has this duality of thought processes that can interpret the real world, the question that needs definition is which process is in overall control or doing the interpretation at any given or specific time.

   This difference is between the imaginative and the real world of mans existence. We start out in the imaginative and as we physically mature our minds mature in kind into the real world. This is normal with one fundamental glitch for many, that is a learned control switch that makes the determination as to when we mentally function as a pure subjective animal, or when we switch to the real objective and empirical world of our humanity. This mental control switch must be established under the authority of the objective mind in order to achieve full intellectual maturity because it is what determines recess or play time, (imaginative) verses development and growth time (truth of fact)! There is a time to sow and a time to harvest so to speak.

   The educational efforts on the part of a society or culture of these principals will determine the development or the decline of that society over time. Each generation must be taught this theory, if cultural progress is to be achieved, continued and unending. The basics of which is; what an individual sees, hears, feels, does not define them or anyone else for that matter. The mind teaches itself, we only need to teach it how to think, not what to think.

   They are each unique as individuals, and the sum of who they are known only to themselves. By the time of full intellectual maturity of the individual their physical presence is the least of who they are!

   Intellectual maturity is not an education it is the development of a thought or the thinking process in anticipation of an education. It is a process by which the individual not only acquires knowledge but in depth objective understanding of it.

   The imaginative powers of the mind are the most effortless and fastest in terms of drawing resolves to the intercourse between us but is also fraught with error and usually governs the earliest stages of human life. Society usually refers to them as smart people. Once a large data base of objective knowledge and understanding is acquired the speed of recall is slower but seldom erroneous in its application. Society usually refers to them as intelligent, then there are those that vacillate between the subjective and objective in thought spontaneously, they constitute the large middle class of thinkers.

   The objective Mind-sets do not contain gender, ethnicity, fear or anger among them for reaching a resolve, but recognizes those consideration in thought as subjective only, like when someone prefaces a statement with; “as a woman I think” which is the subjective mind expressing its self. Or that they cannot accept something for consideration because it upsets them in one way or another,

   Wisdom and truth rarely comes forth from those locked in the subjective, while imaginative things rarely come forth from those locked in the objective mode of thought. No normal person is permanently locked in either mode of thought that is why the control switch needs to be in conscious objective control, to provide the best overall and advantages conditions for both the animal pleasures and intellectual growth and development of each individual.

   In regards to cultures or nations it is incumbent on the people contained within and their thought processes that determines the growth and/or development that each may enjoy or not. Governments can influence but not control with certainty how its peoples think. Those that contain a majority of subjective thinkers will develop least over time.

GAP