Friday, July 30, 2010

Just so Much Noise

   To what practical purpose or value does sound have if no living thing can hear it or understand it? The same holds true for light, or any other of the sensors of the body, if you cannot sense them or understand them they would be valueless tools with no purpose or value to human life. Isn’t it great that we humans have no choice but to experience the benefits of the senses of our own bodies?
   A loud sound to an infant gets its attention but sadly it has no attention to apply. If it’s just a loud sound but has no follow up to the child it will learn to ignore it but it will, always be heard. Eventually the child will investigate the source of the sound but when it finds the source will it understand, most likely not? It will most likely chalk it up to Normal background noise in life and learn to ignore it.
    The preceding is what has developed between people in general because we make noise just for the sake of making noise, so most ignore it and no understanding is ever arrived at. Normal conversations between people appears to be each person making noise and neither understands the source of the others noise. For all practical purposes we talk past one another and only hear the noise with no understanding.
   The more literate American society becomes the more and wider the disparities of understanding between us becomes, and do to the ego no one wants to say I don’t understand what you’re saying! What we do, do is assume we understand instead of demanding clarity and our conversations end up like sound bites on TV totally lacking mutual understanding. We tend to assume what the other persons thoughts are when we don’t clarify.
   As a third party listening, I am fed up hearing one say to the other “so what you’re saying is” followed by gross misinterpretation of the others words. A false premise in conversations is the leading culprits and in failing to clarify those false premises leads to pure nonsense.  Any conversation that ends with, “we just have to agree to disagree” is a complete cop out and nothing short of having just made noise for its own sake, not an intelligent conversation.
   The truth in any matter under discussion is undeniable if the conversation is completely synthesized, and failing to discover that truth leaves both sides of the conversation with but one reality, “neither one knows what they are talking about”. (Just noise)
   We all make poor or bad decisions in life but after 71 years of life I can tell you that everyone, that is every bad decision or judgment I made, was always from using my emotions over my better objective thought processes without exception. I can also tell you that through objective observation of my fellow man it appears to me, to be a universal flaw in the character and thought processes of mankind in general.
   It primarily occurs for what can only be described as ignorance meaning that when we don’t have the knowledge and/or understanding to make a sound objective decision we humans fall back on how we feel about it. That does not include all those that emotionally think they know and understand everything, it is their home base of thought or thinking at all times, and becomes totally out of objective control completely, through the ego of celebrity. 

Friday, July 23, 2010


   The mind of man is not in its entirety photogenic, particularly when it comes to the spoken or written word. Although some phrases may be recalled specifically, the general context goes through a process of synthesizing that arrives as a conceptual picture of it for memory, the details are still there but must go through a focused internal study to find them. (That is why we have reference books etc!)
   Modern educated people today use many words from their learned vocabularies that are not chosen appropriately for the context in which they are used, sometimes intentionally, most times out of their own ignorance were they just seem to fit. This all leads to the listener or reader being unable to synthesize the context giving them an incomplete conceptual picture like a redacted, incomplete or edited picture. So what they might see from memory; the landscape may be yellow, the grass blue, the sun black, the clouds green, and the trees pink, which is nothing like the context of what the speaker or writer was trying to impart. Other times it may be or have a more subtle impact on the context but more than likely a key part of it like using may or can or may and shall inappropriately. Sometime and most prolific misuse is saying you believe something when in fact you don’t know or understand it. All of the fore mentioned degrades the understanding in our civil intercourse in fact bastardizes it.
    This impairment of our communicative skills leads us to make assumptions like; putting someone in authority over others just because they may be skilled at a job, but not shown to be skilled in leadership.
   Those today considered as intellectuals are more likely to be street wise manipulators as apposed to being intellectual in a general or well rounded educational sense.
   Our educators today tend to teach manipulation of the general population by appealing to the emotional as apposed to intellectual enlightenment. Intellectual skills are part of what moves societies forward but rarely leads it constructively. Most truly intellectual people today are like the Germans after WWII, they deny association to the word “intellectual” like the Germans denied association to the word “Nazi”. Modern day, so called intellectuals are for the most part are self promoters as apposed to social or political innovators. They demean the very word “intellectual”.
   Pollution is the hallmark of human civilizations. The most hazardous of pollution to humans is that of the pollution of the human mind some more so than others, but in modern times all. Most pollution of the human mind is caused by societies or cultures and is intentionally polluted to satisfy the ambitions of avarice.
   This problem as far as the individual is concerned needs filtering today as much or more so than has ever been because modern communications between us has accelerated polluting at a rate that is unsustainable to the human condition. The only effective filter known is truth of fact applied to each and every pollutant thereby reducing the aggregate of the effects on humanity at large.
   The truth of fact cannot be imposed on the individual it has to be self acquired and can only be so acquired by recognition of the pollution each holds within and then filtered with the truth. Once filtered is called enlightenment.
   There is only one truth for each pollutant, the idea of multiple truths is just one such pollutant that has infected the minds of men. The truth of fact is established when no objective argument can refute it thus making it undeniable. The only thing that causes a change as to the truth is acquired human knowledge over time. As an individual if you don’t have the knowledge to objectively refute the otherwise known truth, you cannot then declare your own truth separate and apart from the otherwise known truth.
   The truth does not exist in the subjective and can only be found by the objective applications of the human mind. The recognition of the reality of mankind's history does not establish the truth’s of today, but of yesterday!

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Obama & Islam

   The world known truth of fact, when it comes right to it regarding individual human rights, English law and American law set the world standards, which all other nations and cultures only give lip service to internationally.
    The proposition put forth to NASA by the Obama administration that it was due to Muslim countries that advanced the world in mathematics justifies sharing state secrets with them now is only fair, is by all history a farcical understanding of history garnered from his Muslim up bringing.
    At the time in history when Arabic countries were advancing in mathematics they were not Muslim but when Mohammad imposed his Islamic theory on them he damned their efforts toward progress as a people by use of the sword against any and all intelligent people in order to keep them in his century forever as slaves to his will. Mohammad for all intense and purpose was an opportunistic barbarian that would not tolerate decent from his personal dogma and backed it up with brutality and death to any and all dissenters.
   The Arab peoples have as much potential intellectually as any others but can only use it in destructive ways as per the instructions left them via the Koran, on punishment of death even to this day. The true believers of Islam are ignorant barbarians they offer others of this world only to join them in their ignorance or death. Obama is only following Islamic dictate and is only using his western education to further the cause Mohammad initiated, which is capitulation or death.
   Only the most ignorant of humanity could conceive that the purpose for human life was to be satisfied with perpetual sex in the here after. I can assure you that if Allah made anything better than sex he/she kept it for himself in the here after. And to top it off virgins are the worst lay any man will ever get unless he is also sexually ignorant.
   It is this writers conviction that Obama desires to be the modern equivalent of Mohammad over the United States where it is only his personal will and dictates that all Americans must submit to, but American history tells us how that will end.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Why We Shall Prevail

   As long as Americans have the right to keep and bear arms there can never be a complete government take over of our lives because when push come to shove in a show of force all we have to do is step out of back doors take one shot each, and the takeover will be decimated.
   Fifty percent of those who elected BHO made an idealistic mistake and they are in regret as I write. The rest are hard core but only represent 30-35 percent of the whole, which is a world wide percentage in every country on earth even under the strictest controls governments can put in place. The only difference between Americans and other peoples is the ownership of personal weapons which enables us to push back against overwhelming government power and we will always push back when push comes to shove. We are born of the gun and can only die by it.
    Those who imagine they are oppressed in America have no idea what real oppression is like. When the imagined oppressed become threatening and violent against there imagined oppressors, they will experience suppression of their efforts but will still not be oppressed under our Constitution.
    In every culture on earth there are individuals and groups that seek to oppress others, but in America any of their successes will soon be put asunder under the cleansing light of our Constitution by, “we the people”.    
   "The bosom of America is open to receive not only the Opulent and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all Nations and Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation of all our rights and privileges, if by decency and propriety of conduct they appear to merit the enjoyment." --George Washington emphasis added. By GAP
     Make note; Washington used the phrase “of all our rights and privileges” making clear that our rights and privileges exist only within our jurisdiction not recognized universally of or in the whole world of peoples, thus making ones propriety and conduct a limiting factor to the rights of citizenship. This is why illegal immigration should exclude the right to become a citizen of the United States of America.
"The dons, the bashaws, the grandees, the patricians, the sachems, the nabobs, call them by what names you please, sigh and groan and fret, and sometimes stamp and foam and curse, but all in vain. The decree is gone forth, and it cannot be recalled, that a more equal liberty than has prevailed in other parts of the earth must be established in America." --John Adams, letter to Patrick Henry, 1776
"[W]e ought to deprecate the hazard attending ardent and susceptible minds, from being too strongly and too early prepossessed in favor of other political systems, before they are capable of appreciating their own." --George Washington, letter to the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 1795


Friday, July 2, 2010

Parties & Caucus's Vs Representation

"They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they would be the sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please.... Certainly no such universal power was meant to be given them. It was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect." --Thomas Jefferson, 1791
   Elected officials today and how they represent their constituent’s compounds what Jefferson decried by not considering all equally by; Balkanizing the Congress, the Judiciary and the Bureaucracy through the Administrative Branch by specialized groupings of citizens and specialized considerations for each. No such view of American citizens was ever contemplated by the Constitution but is the hallmark of progressive minds in government.
   No Caucus formed in Congress on specialized issues that exclude any other members from participating because of party, gender, race or sexual preference etc is Constitutional. The Constitution gives congress the right to establish there own rules but only if those rules fall within the spirit and intent of equal representation of there constituents, which the present caucus system fails miserably to do, and is the example they have set for society at large that has created most of the civil strife we all live with today.  
   This illegal activity in congress must stop and their rules regarding Caucus’s changed if they are to ever be able to represent all their constituents on a equal footing. While were at it, party control of branches of government is also unconstitutional.
   Party control and influence in government is the source and cause of government corruption through-out, that is why our representatives no longer care what individual constituents think about anything only what the given party leaders say or instructs them that counts anymore, they have all become rubber stamps for the civilian unelected party elites as a forth and I might say Unconstitutional branch of government.
   Politics is the art of deceit once elected we the people expect politics to stop at door of all government offices.
Political Science (sic) is just that, the teaching of our youth in the art of deceit.
   Under these conditions in American government all they have accomplished is to make all true Patriots enemies’ of the State