Summing It Up

Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't; that is the catch 22 used universally by social do goobers of every culture on earth and it represents all of historical genocide among humans. It is the human nature of mankind at work casting stones onto the path that providence has set for mankind we truly are, our own worst enemies.
Where would we be, if people like Alexander Bell or a mired of ‘what if" kind of people said “so what” if it lights up, it just means we will destroy human vision by using it, so we should burn the research, oh but that will pollute the air, no bury it, no that will pollute the earth, maybe just hide it, ignore it or legally seal it from the eyes of all in perpetuity.
Everything or action by either man or nature contains things that are positive and all positive things also have a negative aspects to them and vice-versa. So, what to do? Being as which ever way we go, good and bad exist.
This represents the historical ignorance of mankind since we first appeared on this earth, we are ignorant how in deciding and/or drawing a conclusion in every fork in the road we come to. We humans continually vacillate what we view as and between the good and the bad where what's good today is bad tomorrow. As individuals we have no difficulty deciding about what's good or what's bad for us. The problem and dilemma that faces us is when we try to decide for others what's good or bad for them. There are some universal good and bad, that all can agree on.
Walla!! You now have the founding documents of America which set out only the universal truths of what is good and right for a society and the individuals thereof and made them law. All negative or wrongs ever, in America society, stem from our deviation from the principled tenants of those sacred documents. The real problem for Americans is our historical memory not only American history but world history unbiased by nuance and parsing or reading between the lines and imagining the reality of it..
In modern times the computer holds the historical memory that man seems not to be able to access in real time from the written word or our biology. The mind of man is more capable in processing memory and drawing conclusive direction from it than the computer, but is weak in memory recall.
If you can feed me all the straight honest data about anything, I can draw the best and right conclusion every time and so can any other do likewise, without nuance or parsing or guessing. No pre-summarized data, that is what the minds of men do best and the computer does badly.
GAP